Communities along Colorado’s Crystal River have long been considering how best to protect the river’s long-term health, free-flowing character, and community values. From 2024 to 2026, a community subcommittee met to explore whether a Wild and Scenic River designation could be shaped to both achieve this protection and meet local needs.
In December 2025, Keystone Policy Center was brought on as an independent facilitator to help the group finalize its work and synthesize two years of their research and conversation. Keystone helped the group identify their shared values, assemble their collective knowledge, find ways that Crystal River legislation could meet community needs, and clarify remaining uncertainties. From these materials and conversations, Keystone drafted a report of findings. The report does not include a recommendation for or against designation but aims to serve as a clear and balanced decision-support tool.
For the Crystal River Wild and Scenic Feasibility Subcommittee, Keystone:
- Facilitated subcommittee meetings from December 2025 through the completion of this report
- Synthesized two years of prior meeting records, research, and expert presentations
- Helped the group confirm their shared values, identify ways that legislation could meet community needs, and define the scope of their remaining uncertainties and disagreements
- Ensured the report reflects the subcommittee’s collective learning, not any single participant’s or organization’s position
- Guided successive drafts through subcommittee review to confirm the report matches participants’ shared memory of the process

The final report is a tool for informed decision-making, not an endorsement.
Key Findings in the Report
- Designation is not one-size-fits-all: Congress can tailor Wild and Scenic legislation to address a specific river’s needs, from protections for existing uses to boundary adjustments to community advisory structures.
- Strong protection against dams and diversions: This is the clearest area of community agreement as Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) offers robust protection against federally licensed dams and out-of-basin diversions.
- Private property protections exist, with open questions: Though there is apparently no general federal zoning or condemnation risk, a Section 7 review of the WSRA could still apply to certain private-land projects using federal funding or requiring federal permits.
- Agriculture and augmentation were priorities throughout: The group explored how a future designation could be structured to avoid conflict with the proposed Crystal River Augmentation Plan or the maintenance of existing irrigation infrastructure.
Next Steps
This report now moves to the Crystal River Wild and Scenic and Other Alternatives Feasibility Steering Committee, which will weigh it alongside two other protection strategies under parallel exploration: an intergovernmental agreement and a state-held instream flow right.
Click here to download and read the full report.
You can also learn more about the subcommittee as well as view subcommittee meeting records and materials by going here.








